3 ms·
nntp / usenet. It had moderation problems, because it was built for the world where the internet was academics only, but it worked great before everyone came to
by beagle3 8y ago
nntp / usenet. It had moderation problems, because it was built for the world where the internet was academics only, but it worked great before everyone came to the internet, and it still works great if posting permissions are properly managed (say, a company internal nntp server).
The problems with nntp where of the same kind that email has with spam these days, except they arrived there earlier.
However, the thing that really killed nntp was the fact that it was not supported in Outlook, at a time when Outlook was dominant enough to kill it (and promoting Sharepoint groups at the same time, which were inferior at the time).
So we are now left with google groups (proprietary, and hosted, and only by google), mailing lists (which are inferior in most ways, especially onboarding), phpBB and similar forums (which are inferior in most ways, except moderation).
- stevekemp 8y agoIn these days of "distributed stuff" I'm surprised there isn't a popular forum which uses NNTP for topic/thread storage, and is basically a presentation layer on top of that back-end.
- beagle3 8y agohttp://gmane.org/about/ http://gmane.org/about/ is more or less what you're referring to, and there are others. But the thing with nntp is not the storage - it's the fact that it is standardized. It is extremely convenient to write a newsgroup post, and cc: someone in particular, and when they do a "reply all" the newsgroup is a recipient as well. This does not work with any "forum", and works (but not well) for mailing lists.