Another long-term negative consequence would be the kind of mindset/ thought process they'll develop as they grow up. or eg: right now there's lot of debate ove

Another long-term negative consequence would be the kind of mindset/ thought process they'll develop as they grow up. or eg: right now there's lot of debate over use of computer vision, AI etc and Amazon,Google have already faced backlash. Google corrected their stance at least for the time-being. No such action at Amazon, also I never really got the impression that Amazon had a employee driven culture. Google much better at that. Coming back to the point, when these kids grow up to be 20-40 years old adult, they might not see the negative consequences of state-wide surveillance IF they didn't face any negative consequence/disadvantage due to cams in school. The reverse might also happen,i.e, they face negative consequence/disadvantage at school and so they are cautious about the tech when they grow up. Personally, as a 20 year old, I am in a dilemma. On one side, cameras, vision have a lot of security benefits etc. They seem to be inevitable. Bad actors are always there, it's about how the safeguards which are put in place. what happens to the data and who does what? That's the question. Maybe if there was some large-scale audit system by non-profits, citizen groups etc , it would be better.