4 ms·
I believe Emma Watson was caught up in this as she had an LLC to obscure her ownership in a flat in London so she could avoid stalkers and thus violence. There
by AdamM12 8y ago
I believe Emma Watson was caught up in this as she had an LLC to obscure her ownership in a flat in London so she could avoid stalkers and thus violence. There are legitimate uses for obscuring the ownership of a legal entity.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/emma-watson-panama-papers-database-the-reasons-behind-setting-up-an-offshore-account-a7026076.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/emma-watson-panama...
- gnu8 8y agoSuppose Emma Watson starts dealing heroin, and the state wants to seize her assets. Does she have the right to hide her assets to protect herself from the violence of the state, or only fans?
- AdamM12 8y agosubpoena.
- ebikelaw 8y agoThat's a good reason why a court could order that an LLC be allowed to mask its ownership, but not a good reason why all LLCs should be allowed to do so as a blanket policy.
- AdamM12 8y agoPrivacy is a right not endowed by the state so why would the court be the one to decide before the fact?