3 ms·
It's not doxing by any definition I'm familiar with. Also, this sentence... > Folks at Mozilla actively chose to find a touchy topic, and expose it to cause th
by siddboots 8y ago
It's not doxing by any definition I'm familiar with. Also, this sentence...
> Folks at Mozilla actively chose to find a touchy topic, and expose it to cause the "bad culture fit" argument.
You are insinuating that folks at Mozilla exploited his position on same sex marriage towards a hidden agenda of some kind.
Another interpretation is that folks at Mozilla simply took issue with his position on same sex marriage.
- alf-pogz 8y agoI'm absolutely insinuating that, and the agenda was not hidden. They did not want Brendan Eich to be CEO. It was a hit job. https://www.cnet.com/news/mozilla-under-fire-inside-the-9-day-reign-of-fallen-ceo-brendan-eich/ https://www.cnet.com/news/mozilla-under-fire-inside-the-9-da...
- rpearl 8y agoI don't know why you keep missing the mental leap here: Yeah, people at the company--and outside it--did not want a CEO willing to spend money to actively remove the rights of a group of people. That is the thing they did not want. They didn't go digging to find something to hurt him: he took action, public and on the record, specifically taking away the rights of others. It is true, people did not want that, and they did not hide that fact. Signed, a gay, now married, 2011 Mozilla intern who did not pick up a full time offer in part because some 2012 news of Eich's donation surfaced around the time I was considering pursuing it.