3 ms·
That's a great way to put it. You'd want a system that would instinctively re-implement patterns as a way of protecting itself, as well. I've noticed lately tha
by themodelplumber 8y ago
That's a great way to put it. You'd want a system that would instinctively re-implement patterns as a way of protecting itself, as well. I've noticed lately that if you take business process development, personal productivity, value-creation philosophy, socio-political framework-building (e.g. development of democracy) and combine that sort of thing with the traditional "software OR firmware OR hardware" definition of technology, the human system is always building "technology" toward what might be called survival+. In this human systems/outside-systems interaction there is a periodicity aspect where at times (e.g. giant meteor approaching) human "survival" is definitely the question, and other times we surge way past just putting meat on the table, so to speak.
Also, a trait, e.g. a psychological trait, or a group of them ("values-centered, empathetic, philosophical" vs. "productivity-centered, logical, process-oriented") could be seen as a technology orientation that helps the system build technology of a specific kind.
- chiefalchemist 8y agoThe humans sub-systems compliment each other and at the same time feels like backups of each other. The hardware of genes get adjusted by the software of epigenetics. And who knows what we have yet to find. But it's making more and more sense in a why didn't we see this sooner sorta way.