3 ms·
As I read the sentence, it would be $0.11 plus whatever's in there from California's incentives. It looks to me like the 30% only refers to the federal subsidy.
by CWuestefeld 16y ago
As I read the sentence, it would be $0.11 plus whatever's in there from California's incentives. It looks to me like the 30% only refers to the federal subsidy.
- enjo 16y agoYa.. it seems like a rather marginal savings really (without the credit).
- cwan 16y agoThis in itself is remarkable. Even if costs are at parity, this is still amazing given that the technology is continuing to improve / scale. I'd be curious / suspicious as to the discount rate they are using to calculate the present value of long term costs - this is where they can manipulate the numbers in their favor.
- uvdiv 16y agoThe last link in the article seems to answer this: "A 100-kilowatt Bloom server array costs around $700,000 to $800,000, or $7,500 a kilowatt, after incentives that cover around 50 percent of the costs" http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/bloom-vs.-solar-which-one-is-best/ http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/bloom-vs.-solar-...