3 ms·
The paper (which admittedly I only skimmed, so someone correct me if I'm wrong) seems to indicate that only around 70% of the variance based on a simulation (an
by nimithryn 8y ago
The paper (which admittedly I only skimmed, so someone correct me if I'm wrong) seems to indicate that only around 70% of the variance based on a simulation (and I believe historical data) was due to fishing. The remainder could very well be ontogenic. So it's entirely possible that fishing is only one factor in this phenomenon.