4 ms·
#2 is perhaps one of the most confounding recent areas of research that really starts complicating the study of DNA and how changes to it map to an organism's o
by speby 8y ago
#2 is perhaps one of the most confounding recent areas of research that really starts complicating the study of DNA and how changes to it map to an organism's outcome in the real world over time and in different environments.
As new studies emerge on identical twins/triplets/etc., it has become clear that even identical DNA does not at all have 100% clone of the person, even if they do in fact share the same DNA. Ranging from things like height differences, leg lengths, intelligence levels, and a host of other characteristics, "identical" DNA does not mean physically identical creatures that look and behave exactly the same, even if they are far more similar than different.
- xyhopguy 8y agoEh I disagree. It's been known for a while that you need something other than just DNA to get the heterogeneity of cellular phenotypes. Remember that your Iris and toenails have the same DNA, yet wildly different gene expression profiles. Without cellular memory that would be impossible and we would all still be single celled organisms :)
- adrianN 8y agoI think the interesting discovery has been that epigenetic traits can be inherited to some degree.
- NegativeLatency 8y agoNeo-Neo-Lamarckism ;)
- thaumasiotes 8y ago> As new studies emerge on identical twins/triplets/etc., it has become clear that even identical DNA does not at all have 100% clone of the person, even if they do in fact share the same DNA. Ranging from things like height differences, leg lengths, intelligence levels, and a host of other characteristics New studies weren't needed; this has been known forever. From The Blank Slate: > Even genetically homogeneous strains of flies, mice, and worms, raised in monotonously controlled laboratories, can differ from one another. A fruit fly may have more or fewer bristles under one wing than its bottlemates. One mouse may have three times as many oocytes (cells destined to become eggs) as her genetically identical sister reared in the same lab. One roundworm may live three times as long as its virtual clone in the next dish. The biologist Steven Austad commented on the roundworms' lifespans: "Astonishingly, the degree of variability they exhibit in longevity is not much less than that of a genetically mixed population of humans, who eat a variety of diets, attend to or abuse their health, and are subject to all the vagaries of circumstance -- car crashes, tainted beef, enraged postal workers -- of modern industrialized life." And a roundworm is composed of only 959 cells!