> I think you are purposely mis-interpreting me. You misrepresented yourself by saying "object" when you meant "dict" and saying "practically identical" when y

> I think you are purposely mis-interpreting me. You misrepresented yourself by saying "object" when you meant "dict" and saying "practically identical" when you meant "vaguely syntactically similar". I wasn't trying to nitpick your semantics; I just had no idea that "Python objects are practically identical to JSON" meant "Python dicts are to Python what JSON objects are to JS, oh and also Python dicts have some syntactic similarlities to JSON" or whatever.