5 ms·
Why not Aurora?
by nickthemagicman 8y ago
Why not Aurora?
- tomnipotent 8y agoThey're not on AWS.
- morgo 8y agoBesides being AWS only, Aurora is very expensive when you factor the IO costs for a large deployment. That's not to say that I'm not a fan of it, but it's for a smaller sized deployment than GitHub. You can see this for yourself on the customer list here: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/customers/ https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/customers/