Oh, thanks for the link. I'm about to read your paper. I should clarify that when I said FUDI is faster, I was repeating the grumblings I've heard on pd's ema

Oh, thanks for the link. I'm about to read your paper. I should clarify that when I said FUDI is faster, I was repeating the grumblings I've heard on pd's email list, despite not having benchmarked anything myself. With tcl's "everything is a string" (0) format, I could imagine this being contextual. But I am really curious. (0) - https://wiki.tcl.tk/3018 https://wiki.tcl.tk/3018 You might find this kinda funny, a piece of pd's documentation regarding the osc objects: "OSC is a complicated networking protocol (FUDI, as used in netsend/netreceive is simpler and better but less widely used). oscparse and oscformat make no attempt to deal with timetags or aggregates of packets, nor with streaming OSC. Also, no attempt is made here to clearly distinguish between the OSC address (symbols) and the following data, nor between blobs and lists of numbers - it is assumed that you know what types the message should contain. You can alternatively use the OSC objects from mrpeach which have more features than these."