3 ms·

Simple really: "BigMedia" want me to pay to link to this, so here's the same topic on SmallMediaSite. or I wanted to link this, but "BigMedia" want me to pay,

• ajross 8y ago
  > Simple really: "BigMedia" want me to pay to link to this, so here's the same topic on SmallMediaSite. It's actually more damaging than that from the perspective of EU regulators: "I can't link to that Le Monde article, so here's a WaPo piece about the same subject". Internet content delivery spans borders, by design. All this does is disadvantage the local producers and force their customer's eyeballs offshore.
  • vageli 8y ago
    > Internet content delivery spans borders, by design. All this does is disadvantage the local producers and force their customer's eyeballs offshore. Coupled with GDPR and many websites around the world shutting down or closing their doors to European users, there won't be many places to go. The overarching trend of artificial borders on the internet is terrifying.
    • oldcynic 8y ago
      I don't understand trying to conflate GDPR and this copyright proposal. GDPR is a reasonably written attempt to preserve some measure of citizen privacy (i.e. you and me). It's an extension and continuation of Data Protection that's been there 20 years. Companies coped with no ill effect. The copyright proposal is entirely for the benefit of large media companies, and the smell of lobbyists is overpowering. (i.e. not you and me)
    • josteink 8y ago
      > Coupled with GDPR and many websites around the world shutting down or closing their doors to European users, That’s hyperbole. Most websites provenly don’t. The GDPR is reasonable. This is not. No need to conflate them.