I guess my wording wasn't the best. My point was that source code which is available, but only under a non-permissive license, would certainly not be considered

I guess my wording wasn't the best. My point was that source code which is available, but only under a non-permissive license, would certainly not be considered free. Some people, first and foremost rms, dismiss the term "open source" completely for missing the point. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSZZraHN0Yg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSZZraHN0Yg