>I concede those are pretty good reasons, but they would unravel sooner or later if there were no truth to them. Yes, surely if you would spend billions to fig

>I concede those are pretty good reasons, but they would unravel sooner or later if there were no truth to them. Yes, surely if you would spend billions to fight a imaginary enemy whos people have to wait in line for toilet paper, that would be something you would remember. Man, those people in the Security Community are so incompetent, they trashed there own paper-potemkin-advesary (russia) by accident and now have to make up a new one. Not even congress would buy that more Hightech is necessary to fight the taliban. Best would be, if the US accepted that there wil always be some ridiculous spending on "imagined advesaries" and choose the advesaries more by the potential tech outcome. Im pretty sure, those Antarcticans are plotting to conquer the Asteroid belt - building energy collecting deathrays and the evil Europeans are trying to establish underwater colonys on europa. Death to Antarctica!