4 ms·
I think you misread the article. The author's contract hadn't even ACTUALLY expired. The end date was wrong on the system. That doesn't actually affect his con
by maaark 8y ago
I think you misread the article.
The author's contract hadn't even ACTUALLY expired. The end date was wrong on the system. That doesn't actually affect his contract.
- garmaine 8y agoThe article says that his former boss, who left the company, neglected to file the paperwork on extending his contract. There was intent to extend, and everyone thought that’s what happened, except for the fact that it didn’t actually happen.
- vinceguidry 8y agoThere's the contract that was signed, and then there's the HR documentation as it appears in the system. The contract was signed, but the HR documentation wasn't.