4 ms·
The supreme court has never ruled against the use of drugs for religious purposes in a broad sense, so there's that at least.
by Alex3917 8y ago
The supreme court has never ruled against the use of drugs for religious purposes in a broad sense, so there's that at least.
- dgzl 8y agoThis is why salvia is legal to buy.
- agnonnnomen 8y agoYou'd think that would go without saying as any theologists ought to be able to derive drug (read: drug-abuse) prohibition from first principles.
- rtkwe 8y agoThis case seems to poke a hole in the religious exercise loophole right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith#Facts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith#F...