4 ms·
Your first two lines are indistinguishable from parody. "A good trade deal doesn’t require 5,600 pages." A Trump talking point, like every one of your posts.
by endorphone 8y ago
Your first two lines are indistinguishable from parody.
"A good trade deal doesn’t require 5,600 pages."
A Trump talking point, like every one of your posts. But you're surely no Trump fan...
Yes, of course trade agreements are voluminous. Saying that it's suspicious because it's big is the sort of nonsensical claim that sells to idiots.
TPP was very unpopular, humorously because of sections added by the United States. Corporate rights, right to sue sovereigns, etc, were all at the behest of the US of A. Sections on extending copyrights and IP rights -- US of A. TPP was viewed as some new world order with some superseding power, and all of that was the work of the US.
>The number alone is meaningless without context.
Just as trade imbalances are meaningless because [waves hand], until they're what you want to argue.
When the US, with a large trade surplus, complains about a tariff in dairy, where the US has a large trade surplus, in an industry where the US has enormous subsidies ($22B USD per year in direct and indirect subsidies), the whole conversations turns to just farce. It is patter to sell to imbeciles.
- IanDrake 8y agoYou’re all over the place. You like the TPP, the TPP is crap because of the US (under Obama) added things you don’t like, Trump is an idiot for not signing it. Agreements that can’t be read and comprehended in one day aren’t good agreements. I stand by that, no matter what Trump says, no matter what you say. I’m not arguing about trade imbalances on a surplus/deficit amount. I don’t care about the amount. I care about access to markets and a level playing field. There is no hypocrisy there. The difference between you and I, is that I’m willing to admit where you are right. The US subsidizes farmers and other industries. I imagine those are up for negotiation too. I also admit Trump acts like a horses ass. I’m just willing to let that slide if he’s an effective horses ass. I also haven’t implied you’re stupid.
- endorphone 8y agoI didn't say I like or dislike the TPP agreement, so I'm not sure where you get that from. Trump had no notable objection to it, beyond his normal pejoratives and limited palette of adjectives, when ultimately it addresses precisely many of his complaints. Because he isn't arguing merits, or what's best for the US. He's pitching a grand show for his base.