3 ms·
> Such vehicles would not be street legal. On slow roads, I've often seen them driven around summer communities. It would be silly for the government to not al
by alehul 8y ago
> Such vehicles would not be street legal.
On slow roads, I've often seen them driven around summer communities. It would be silly for the government to not allow this.
> They would not be safe for passengers.
The above commenter pointed out "enough trust for 2 tons of metal and a passenger," so I'm assuming the idea is that they don't have a passenger in them at this stage. Additionally, regardless of whether an SUV is safer for the individual behind the wheel, shouldn't it be that individual accepting the risk and not a random pedestrian who didn't consent to this experiment?
> They would be unable to carry the necessary payloads.
Do they really carry payloads at this stage? Isn't the focus on building a safe autonomous system?
> Most of the weight of a car is in the chassis anyway, not the body.
The golf carts are 1/8th to 1/4th the weight of a crossover, for example.
The substantial issue I'd guess would be the differences in all aspects of performance between a real car and a golf cart, but at this stage companies like Uber should clearly just be testing detection of pedestrians et al.
- sdhgaiojfsa 8y agoAt any rate, Google did do something like what that person described for a few years. Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJnjuhBIhwc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJnjuhBIhwc That stage of testing is past, though.
- alehul 8y agoThanks for the link! It seems reasonable that there should be some regulation on "x miles per incident" before autonomous vehicle companies are allowed to move forward from carts to full-sized cars. Based on the stats that have been posted on HN, Google is very safe. Uber, on the other hand, is not.