4 ms·
> Even a tiny fixed fee of $50 per error might be enough If the fine went to the person who uploaded the work, this would be good because it would force the fi
by cabalamat 8y ago
> Even a tiny fixed fee of $50 per error might be enough
If the fine went to the person who uploaded the work, this would be good because it would force the filter to be robust in the face of adversarial attacks.
- ben_w 8y agoI’m no lawyer, but deliberately performing adversarial attacks to get rich from being automatically and incorrectly fined feels like it ought to be somewhere between fraud and hacking (in the Computer Misuse Act sense rather than thr hackernews sense).
- dotancohen 8y agoThat would create a cottage industry of borderline-infringing works designed to trigger the filter but win in court.
- DennisP 8y agoI.e. they would trigger bad copyright takedowns that weren't legally justified, forcing companies to stop doing those. If it's possible to trigger those intentionally, then it's likely that it's also happening accidentally, and this policy would make that stop.