4 ms·
> But I do have a problem believing that all of the problems since the Model 3 started production were caused by sabotage. So, uh, where exactly is that said?
by jccooper 8y ago
> But I do have a problem believing that all of the problems since the Model 3 started production were caused by sabotage.
So, uh, where exactly is that said? In the email, or anywhere for that matter? On my monitor, the email doesn't claim any influence on Model 3 production problems, much less "all".
> suggesting that other forces are involved
"Investigation" and "be extremely vigilant" are a mite different from "suggesting".
You might want to consider talking about what is actually written.
- twblalock 8y ago> You might want to consider talking about what is actually written. You might want to consider that the author knows full well that the implication is what really matters, and that people who only think about the literal written words are missing the point.
- crististm 8y agoThere is also the case that filling too much between the lines is in danger of driving its own narrative.
- jakobegger 8y agoDid you see this paragraph in Musk's email? It is pretty suggestive: > As you know, there are a long list of organizations that want Tesla to die. These include Wall Street short-sellers, who have already lost billions of dollars and stand to lose a lot more. Then there are the oil & gas companies, the wealthiest industry in the world — they don't love the idea of Tesla advancing the progress of solar power & electric cars. Don't want to blow your mind, but rumor has it that those companies are sometimes not super nice. Then there are the multitude of big gas/diesel car company competitors. If they're willing to cheat so much about emissions, maybe they're willing to cheat in other ways?