3 ms·
i thought we already solved that; it's called journalism just read the economist or NYT or whatever you like and stfu instead of thinking you're going to someh
by internetman55 8y ago
i thought we already solved that; it's called journalism
just read the economist or NYT or whatever you like and stfu instead of thinking you're going to somehow to a better job gathering and exploring information than that
- robotresearcher 8y agoI'd like to do that. But every time there is a story about something I really do know about, it is so wrong as to be highly misleading.
- jwatte 8y agoThat's not new. Journalists aren't experts in any profession, that's always been the case.
- robotresearcher 8y agoSure. I’m just pointing out a problem with the approach of the previous post, where ‘stfu’ was the advice.
- internetman55 8y agoBut is there any evidence that whatever you come up with will be better than simply reading a reputable newspaper or magazine?
- obelix_ 8y agoJust wrote this 3 days ago - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17325760 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17325760