> Even video taken at 300K fps by the Slow Mo Guys was slowed down even further and looks even smoother than the original. This suggests that the video accompa

> Even video taken at 300K fps by the Slow Mo Guys was slowed down even further and looks even smoother than the original. This suggests that the video accompanying that quote shows 300k fps footage, but that can't be right. If you film at 300k fps and play back at a (generous) 60 fps, that is a slow-down factor of 5000. The footage of the tennis racket and the bursting balloon is slowed down, but not 5000x. Perhaps 50x, perhaps even 500x (doubtful) but definitely not 5000x. Say the pool jump or the racket swing each takes only 0.1s real time. At 5000x that would mean 500s, or about 8 minutes. Clearly, the slow footage isn't _that_ slow. This being said, the Nvidia results do look very impressive, I'm not trying to take away from that.