> The article claims that life without Facebook is impossible Does it? This is the closest I can get: > Facebook has been giving many people many reasons not

> The article claims that life without Facebook is impossible Does it? This is the closest I can get: > Facebook has been giving many people many reasons not to sign up over the years. But we’ve had to: everyone we knew was on Facebook. And eventually, this trickled up and our parents were on Facebook. Now the trickle down effects of this are the opposite: kids don’t want to be on Facebook because it’s what their parents are using. That's not really the same as "impossible". > Is this article more a reflection of the author's poor self control than of reality? Is poor self control the only reason one would be on Facebook?