5 ms·

It would be good if either of you could back up your claims. People in minority communities around the U.S. have said for generations that the police abused th

It would be good if either of you could back up your claims. People in minority communities around the U.S. have said for generations that the police abused them; I give that some serious credibility. Also, there is much more to abuse than killings; there are many reports on widespread abuses by police departments, such as Baltimore and New Orleans. I will add that in at least some other countries police do their job and shoot hardly anyone; I think in Scotland it's on the order of one per decade.

AmericanChopper 8y ago
The claim that there is systemic racially motivated killings carried out by police is the claim that needs to be backed up. This is a claim that is not supported by facts. There is a small number of officer involved shootings that are found to be unjustified, and there are entire communities of people who will jump at the chance to report on them, so it’s not like they can slip under the radar on a massive scale. The crime rates in different countries have absolutely 0 bearing on whether office involved shootings in the US are justified. The occurrences of unjustified office involved shootings in the US don’t come even remotely close to anything that could be considered ‘systemic’, the whole narrative is an outright lie.
tzs 8y ago
> It would be good if either of you could back up your claims If any of the people in this thread wish to have a go at that, try here: http://www.killedbypolice.net/kbp2018 http://www.killedbypolice.net/kbp2018 Pick a year, note how many police shootings are listed there for that year, then generate 20 random numbers in the range [1, N] where N is the number of said shootings, and look at the corresponding killings. That should give some reasonable insights.