3 ms·
That should honestly be a more frequently employed tactic in codebases.
by paulie_a 8y ago
That should honestly be a more frequently employed tactic in codebases.
- favorited 8y agoI'm definitely a believer in this. I read Carmack refer to it as "grooming" at one point. Codebases where components and subsystems are periodically rewritten naturally end up being easier to change, which is an undervalued metric.
- setquk 8y agoDefinitely agree. However it mostly depends on your product being well isolated little chunks of functionality which is rarely the case. So what happens is you end up with a perpetually half baked Cthulhu.