actually at this stage of this litigation, the market is defined as whatever the plaintiff says it is. Because the issue here is standing to sue. The case will

actually at this stage of this litigation, the market is defined as whatever the plaintiff says it is. Because the issue here is standing to sue. The case will get to the definition of relevant market later on, assuming this standing hurdle is resolved in favor of the plaintiff consumers. But I do agree with you on the merits. The relevant market ought to be mobile apps generally, not iOS apps. That's just not the question for which the US Supreme Court granted certiorari (as other comments have pointed out).