3 ms·
I wonder whether some substantial portion of cryptoanarchism isn't really meant to be anarchism in the fullest sense, but more anarchism-but-only-within-a-parti
by drdeca 8y ago
I wonder whether some substantial portion of cryptoanarchism isn't really meant to be anarchism in the fullest sense, but more anarchism-but-only-within-a-particular-domain?
Like, less "make the government not exist", and more "make it so goverments are unable to control things like communication, and some sorts of commerce"?
I don't know that self-described cryptoanarchists almost always have much opposition to the requirement of a drivers license in order to drive on the public roads.
I suspect that a non-negligible portion does really object to that requirement, but I'm not confident that the majority of them do.
- CiPHPerCoder 8y ago> I wonder whether some substantial portion of cryptoanarchism isn't really meant to be anarchism in the fullest sense, but more anarchism-but-only-within-a-particular-domain? It varies from person to person. I happen to like the message in A Cipherpunk's Manifesto, but I also happen to dislike blockchain mania.