4 ms·

It's hard to make any judgement of a language that's barely a year old, especially about performance and libraries. All industry standard languages are at least

It's hard to make any judgement of a language that's barely a year old, especially about performance and libraries. All industry standard languages are at least a decade old. > C++ and Java are the gold-standard for library-centric concurrency methodologies. It's a standard, but it is not by any means the gold standard. Just about anything would be a better concurrency model. Also see "Threads Cannot be Implemented as a Library": http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-209.html http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-209.html

alnayyir 16y ago
>It's hard to make any judgement of a language that's barely a year old, especially about performance and libraries. All industry standard languages are at least a decade old. It's a product of their design decisions and has nothing at all to do with implementation or time. Look at Rust if you want to see a realistic up-and-coming systems programming language. >It's a standard, but it is not by any means the gold standard. Just about anything would be a better concurrency model. Right, well get back to me when you write that multi-threaded web server in Python.