>By that timetable I'd say that Go has a few years yet before it can fairly be judged a success or a failure. I don't care, that's not what I'm talking about.

>By that timetable I'd say that Go has a few years yet before it can fairly be judged a success or a failure. I don't care, that's not what I'm talking about. I was talking about the use-case uncanny valley it sits in. If you have a point unrelated to anything I said, use your blog. I've had enough grief from hackerne.ws over the past week that I have zero patience for someone using me as some kind of pontification aid. I know what's involved in making a kernel, and what's typical for systems programming and embedded development today. I don't give a good goddamn what the devs of Go have to say about it. Use case inappropriate. That's the last time I'm repeating myself.