4 ms·
ContentID is not AI by any definition of AI, it's signal processing.
by Jyaif 8y ago
ContentID is not AI by any definition of AI, it's signal processing.
- thomastjeffery 8y agoIt's automated decision-making.
- kazinator 8y agoAny algorithm that produces a Boolean result is "automated decision making". You pop in the inputs, let the automaton run, and there is your yes or no.
- gowld 8y agoYes, that's right. The boundaries of AI are qualitative, not quantitative. AI can be simplistic or complex, dumb or smart.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jexah 8y agoAI doesn't have to learn to be classed as AI. Source: Every video game ever made. Just look at deep blue. Most would consider that AI, but AFAIK there is zero machine learning involved. Edit: I think I hit the wrong reply button, meant to reply to parent, haha.
- LordDragonfang 8y agoI believe the implication is that youtube has replaced the human reviewers with an ML-based system.
- kazinator 8y agoContentID isn't learning because it doesn't train to make inferences; it looks for exact signature matches on the audio, normalizing for alterations like pitch changes and equalization. All sorts of computer applications that are not considered AI have replaced humans. For instance, databases replace clerks having to shuffle papers to and from filing cabinets.
- gnulinux 8y agoI think saying signal processing is AI is like saying the entire CS is AI, which is bizarre. There are all sorts of algorithms and disciplines in CS that are not AI. I think the commenter you're replying to was complaining about this.