4 ms·
Sure - but that wasn't what he said. He said that requiring facebook makes him think that the website owner shouldn't be trusted with data. Which has nothing t
by far33d 16y ago
Sure - but that wasn't what he said. He said that requiring facebook makes him think that the website owner shouldn't be trusted with data.
Which has nothing to do w/ lock-in on 3rd party websites. It has to do w/ the relative security competence of those who choose to use FB Connect vs. those who choose email.
- mike-cardwell 16y agoWho said anything about security? I would take a "Facebook only" login system to imply that the creator of the website makes bad decisions. I'd prefer to not hand over data to people who make such poor decisions.