4 ms·
It is not the same as not voting. Even if one disagrees with what the rest of the country decides, one should vote. If more people voted their conscience, the p
by mcculley 8y ago
It is not the same as not voting. Even if one disagrees with what the rest of the country decides, one should vote. If more people voted their conscience, the parties would be forced to reform.
- jakelazaroff 8y agoYou're speaking hypothetically, but I'm speaking pragmatically. In the 2020 Presidential election, a Democrat or Republican will be elected, and a third-party vote will have the same effect on that as not voting: none, (arguably, unless it comes at the expense of a Democrat or Republican vote).
- boomboomsubban 8y agoObama broke the record for most whistleblowers tried under the Espionage Act, and Trump is on pace to beat that record. So if that issue matters to you, voting Republican or Democrat has the same effect as not voting. Same thing if you are opposed to the wars. Real pragmatic choice.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- mcculley 8y agoYou are speaking hyperbolically. I voted in the 2016 election. I did not vote for Clinton or Trump. My vote had a very small effect on those who would try to win my vote. If I had not voted at all, that effect would be less. If more people voted their conscience instead of playing a losing game against the entrenched parties, the parties would listen to the voters.