6 ms·
IMO the railway analogy works well, because it describes the right dimensionality. It's sort of a 1.5D problem with a directed graph, with a chain of events plu
by m_mueller 8y ago
IMO the railway analogy works well, because it describes the right dimensionality. It's sort of a 1.5D problem with a directed graph, with a chain of events plus a fallback chain. A railway captures that perfectly while giving people a clear picture they can understand, assuming they imagine a train that can only move in one direction and decides its path based on switches on the track. With something like a glider you could ask questions like "but what if it flies off to the East" or "what about vertical air movements that carry it up or down" and so on...
- jgtrosh 8y agoI agree that's a problem with the glider image, but that's the issue I had with railroads as well—there's much more freedom than what is shown here; railroads can go multiple ways, join in various orders etc. What I mean is one line change in a given direction does not imply subsequent ones will be in the same.