4 ms·
> And that decision is a bit questionable anyway. It's quite likely that more .com domains have been seized by the US government than .ly domains seized by the
by Already__Taken 8y ago
> And that decision is a bit questionable anyway. It's quite likely that more .com domains have been seized by the US government than .ly domains seized by the Libyan government.
Depends on how you factor in the appeals process going in your favour.
- olivermarks 8y agoI think the 'seizing by Libyan Government' thing is a bit of a red herring. I wrote this on ZDnet way back in 2011 on this topic https://www.zdnet.com/article/dead-ly-urls-and-authoritarian-social-network-tracking/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/dead-ly-urls-and-authoritarian...
- TheForumTroll 8y ago>appeals process You have a bigger chance of justice in an appeal with a .ly than a .com - unless you know the right people at UDRP/ICANN. They make Muammar Gaddafi look like a saint!