4 ms·
From the first link: "Comparing OFDM to LTE today we find a better scalability to a much lower latency (an order of magnitude lower round-trip time [RTT] than L
by matt4711 8y ago
From the first link: "Comparing OFDM to LTE today we find a better scalability to a much lower latency (an order of magnitude lower round-trip time [RTT] than LTE today) in OFDM."
Doesn't LTE already have quite good latency properties?
- padelt 8y agoOne data point: LTE gives me 65-90ms ping RTT in reasonable non-crowded indoor conditions. Subjectively, working interactively via LTE is totally fine for me. Compare that to UMTS (3G T-Mobile DE) where I think RTT was more like 350ms and working interactively is a pain.
- dx034 8y agoAnything >10ms can be noticeable if you have a lot of requests or symmetric applications. But I find reliability the far bigger problem with LTE than performance if everything goes right. Not sure how 5G will perform there.
- gballan 8y agoAs I understand it, not good enough for "vehicular communication, industrial control, factory automation, remote surgery, smart grids and public safety applications" [1]. A lot of the improvement is down to the frame structure (i.e., how user and training data are distributed in time and frequency). See "Frame structure" in [1]. [1] https://www.ericsson.com/en/ericsson-technology-review/archive/2017/designing-for-the-future-the-5g-nr-physical-layer https://www.ericsson.com/en/ericsson-technology-review/archi...
- chrispeel 8y agoIt depends on what you mean by "good". With 5G NR it will at least be possible to get to .5 ms or less. https://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/5g-waves/4460346/5G--The-road-to-low-latency https://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/5g-waves/4460346/5G--T...