3 ms·
> so nobody sensible worries about zombie attacks As an interesting aside to this comment: https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/zombie/index.htm https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/z
by King-Aaron 8y ago
> so nobody sensible worries about zombie attacks
As an interesting aside to this comment: https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/zombie/index.htm https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/zombie/index.htm
- Iv 8y agoI guess the CDC does this in good faith but for military, zombie scenarios are a way to prepare for civilian uprisings without explicitly naming it. Easier to make a "zombie plague preparedness" exercise than a "Trump supporters take arms when their president is impeached". Zombies are a local inside enemy that allow training on the domestic territory. Hard to name a fictional enemy that would not make headlines otherwise.
- ithkuil 8y agoWould a generic "terrorists" label spur too much controversy?
- Iv 8y agoTerrorists that would take over a whole civilian area and are able to send waves of thousands of infantry? Yes, clearly.
- Semirhage 8y agoIt’s not necessarily that, it can also be tacitly referring to external civilian influxes, such as mass migration events. Either way, it’s a grim business that few people seem to grasp the full import of.