> What constitutes “ripping people off” is an incredibly political and ever-shifting judgment. I think that for the example given, ICOs, the opposite is true.

> What constitutes “ripping people off” is an incredibly political and ever-shifting judgment. I think that for the example given, ICOs, the opposite is true. For "most" of these situations, whether something is a straight up scam or not is very obvious. And I am glad that the SEC has chosen to mostly go after the scams. Sure, grey areas will come up. But what does it matter if the grey areas are less than 1% of the market? There are certainly cases in the world where the nitty gritty details matter, and that there are huge grey areas. I just don't think the ICO market is one of these nuanced cases.