3 ms·
I think most of us are aware of why people steal content without lengthy, pretentious explanations. The point is that the OP acts as if he couldn’t possibly con
by IAmGraydon 8y ago
I think most of us are aware of why people steal content without lengthy, pretentious explanations. The point is that the OP acts as if he couldn’t possibly consider not watching. He believes that someone should provide it to him on the terms he deems fair or he has no choice but to steal it. OP is the textbook definition of a sociopath.
- falcor84 8y agoI would argue that by using the term "steal" in regarding to content, you demonstrate why we do need to continue this dialog. There is no single truth here and I think that you are being overly offensive in saying that, by advocating for a different set of social rights, the OP is a sociopath. By the same token, any civil disobedience should be treated as sociopathy, no?
- benchaney 8y ago> He believes that someone should provide it to him on the terms he deems fair or he has no choice but to steal it He made no such claim. You have to foundation from which to argue he believes this. > OP is the textbook definition of a sociopath. Blatantly lying about what someone else believes to paint them in a negative light is much more sociopathic than pirating something.
- teamk 8y agoIf I told you a short story and then informed you it was copyrighted by me and you were morally forbidden from repeating said story, but you still repeated it, are you now a sociopath? What a ridiculous stretch of logic. On the contrary the idea that people's lives/property should be threatened (e.g. Kim Dotcom, ThePirateBay, etc.) for interfering, vaguely, in multinational conglomerates attempts to prevent the copying of 1s and 0s is entirely sociopathic. Something that most corporations end up behaving as.