3 ms·

I'm sorry, but I can't take such a study seriously when it's using data collected from East Germany pre fall of Communism, when it had one of if not the most in

I'm sorry, but I can't take such a study seriously when it's using data collected from East Germany pre fall of Communism, when it had one of if not the most intrusive surveillance societies in human history. There's simply too great a possibility that the fear of study participants would have altered their responses to avoid reprisal. To a lesser extent, I'd cast a skeptical glance on this kind of data any society with collectivist pressures until presented with a very high standard of evidence that the participants were convincingly guaranteed their responses were untraceably dissociated from their regular lives.

nisa 8y ago
Did you read the abstract? They conducted an online survey and asked where the participants where coming from. They collected the data a few months ago. Besides that you seem to have no idea how society actually worked in Eastern Germany - trust to medical personel was actually pretty high and health care was good. STEM subjects were hard science and also medicine education was good. Not sure about psychiatry but western countries did lobotomy until the 80ies... So I guess if they would have screened in the GDR for that, the data might be accurate enough - but you didn't bother to read the abstract. Stasi worked different - they didn't bother with regular folks but were focussed on dissidents (wearing blue jeans and having long hair was often enough, through) and people in power positions or with connections outside of GDR were targeted. Reprisal was not like in North Korea where you end up in the gulag (stuff like that happend, I just want to clarify not excuse them) - it was a much more nuanced system - you don't get the flat or job an stuff like this. People planning for or announcing public discontent with system got often harsh treatment but everday folks could speak open as long as you didn't articulate discontent with the system - even that was allowed to a certain degree.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

nisa 8y ago

Did you read the abstract? They conducted an online survey and asked where the participants where coming from. They collected the data a few months ago. Besides that you seem to have no idea how society actually worked in Eastern Germany - trust to medical personel was actually pretty high and health care was good. STEM subjects were hard science and also medicine education was good. Not sure about psychiatry but western countries did lobotomy until the 80ies... So I guess if they would have screened in the GDR for that, the data might be accurate enough - but you didn't bother to read the abstract. Stasi worked different - they didn't bother with regular folks but were focussed on dissidents (wearing blue jeans and having long hair was often enough, through) and people in power positions or with connections outside of GDR were targeted. Reprisal was not like in North Korea where you end up in the gulag (stuff like that happend, I just want to clarify not excuse them) - it was a much more nuanced system - you don't get the flat or job an stuff like this. People planning for or announcing public discontent with system got often harsh treatment but everday folks could speak open as long as you didn't articulate discontent with the system - even that was allowed to a certain degree.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]