4 ms·
Well, for one thing, this becomes a bigger and bigger problem: http://www.xkcd.com/792/ http://www.xkcd.com/792/ Yes, it's a ridiculous example, but the vast m
by yock 16y ago
Well, for one thing, this becomes a bigger and bigger problem:
http://www.xkcd.com/792/ http://www.xkcd.com/792/
Yes, it's a ridiculous example, but the vast majority of end users keep the same username and password for all of their online services. Obtain one U/P pair and you could conceivably access their identity anywhere. A centralized, specialized authentication provider could maintain multiple levels of authentication depending on what the service demanded. Perhaps your favorite news aggregator only required that you be authenticated with a username and password, but your bank could be using the same authentication service and demand a physical token or one-time password to continue to the service.
The idea is to maintain the convenience we already demand and practice in a manner which is orders of magnitude more secure.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- julianz 16y agoThat XKCD made me go back through a whole lot of my "low security" sites and change the password away from the same old thing I'd used for ages. Still funny though :)