3 ms·
http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html 4. Naughtiness Though the most successful founders are usually good people, th
by resentfuljoe 8y ago
http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html
4. Naughtiness
Though the most successful founders are usually good people, they tend to have a piratical gleam in their eye. They're not Goody Two-Shoes type good. Morally, they care about getting the big questions right, but not about observing proprieties. That's why I'd use the word naughty rather than evil. They delight in breaking rules, but not rules that matter. This quality may be redundant though; it may be implied by imagination.
Sam Altman of Loopt is one of the most successful alumni, so we asked him what question we could put on the Y Combinator application that would help us discover more people like him. He said to ask about a time when they'd hacked something to their advantage—hacked in the sense of beating the system, not breaking into computers. It has become one of the questions we pay most attention to when judging applications.
- dmix 8y ago> hacked in the sense of beating the system, not breaking into computers.
- dcposch 8y agoPG is absolutely correct in my experience. The best founders are Chaotic Good on the alignment chart. > Morally, they care about getting the big questions right, but not about observing proprieties. Holmes does not match that description at all. Lying to investors, lying to the FDA, secretly using your competitors' tech to mask the fact that your core product does not work. She did not care about getting the big questions right.