4 ms·

People want it... Yes, but do gitlab users want it? I’m not arguing theres a place for a web ide... sure. That’s a thing. ...but as part of gitlab? really? .

People want it... Yes, but do gitlab users want it? I’m not arguing theres a place for a web ide... sure. That’s a thing. ...but as part of gitlab? really? ...and lets be explicit here; part of gitlab instead of a stand alone product? What if you want an IDE that uses a different source control? Whats the benefit to me of having it as part of gitlab?

swsieber 8y ago
You? Maybe not to much. It IT, perhaps quite a bit more. As for myself, I don't think I could ever get my company to approve (well, setup) a Web IDE, but if it's part of GitLab...
veidr 8y ago
Well, I can't say for sure if if would benefit you, but the one thing I found useful about it is that it makes it easy to do code reviews without checking out the whole project. At work we use GitHub, so to do a code review I have to check out the working branch or PR that I am reviewing, and review it in my local IDE/editor software. I have to do that because the web UI that shows the PR diff generally isn't sufficient to really review the code. I want to quickly jump to related files to follow the code path, keep the subset of files I'm referring to open in new tabs, get a project-level view of how the pieces fit together, and maybe step through some of the code in the debugger. Now, the first two are possible just using a web UI but it's very unlike a normal code editing experience. Using the GitLab IDE interface makes it easier to do the first three of those things. It still cannot actually run/debug a program, but I presume that their goal is to someday enable that kind of thing, at least for some kinds of projects. Today, all major git repo hosting services have rudimentary web-based single-file text editors — seems to me that adding IDE-like multi-file project-level editors is a pretty straightforward and logical extension of that. So yeah, as a GitLab user, I want this. As a GitHub user, I want them to copy this idea and implement something similar. And if I were a BitBucket user...

swsieber 8y ago

You? Maybe not to much. It IT, perhaps quite a bit more. As for myself, I don't think I could ever get my company to approve (well, setup) a Web IDE, but if it's part of GitLab...

veidr 8y ago

Well, I can't say for sure if if would benefit you, but the one thing I found useful about it is that it makes it easy to do code reviews without checking out the whole project. At work we use GitHub, so to do a code review I have to check out the working branch or PR that I am reviewing, and review it in my local IDE/editor software. I have to do that because the web UI that shows the PR diff generally isn't sufficient to really review the code. I want to quickly jump to related files to follow the code path, keep the subset of files I'm referring to open in new tabs, get a project-level view of how the pieces fit together, and maybe step through some of the code in the debugger. Now, the first two are possible just using a web UI but it's very unlike a normal code editing experience. Using the GitLab IDE interface makes it easier to do the first three of those things. It still cannot actually run/debug a program, but I presume that their goal is to someday enable that kind of thing, at least for some kinds of projects. Today, all major git repo hosting services have rudimentary web-based single-file text editors — seems to me that adding IDE-like multi-file project-level editors is a pretty straightforward and logical extension of that. So yeah, as a GitLab user, I want this. As a GitHub user, I want them to copy this idea and implement something similar. And if I were a BitBucket user...