> could be perceived as discriminatory I believe "could be perceived" is incorrect; there is a large amount of evidence that it is discriminatory, and that the

> could be perceived as discriminatory I believe "could be perceived" is incorrect; there is a large amount of evidence that it is discriminatory, and that therefore the most deserving students aren't getting opportunities and that the university is shortchanging itself on the quality of its student body. > one stated goal to make the student body mirror the general population Who stated that? Also, it's not a bad guide given that talent is distributed relatively equally. > Is it even the role of higher education to remedy the cards that have already been dealt, and even if so what evidence is there that it actually does what people say it does? What do you think, and more importantly to fellow users, on what is it based? Shall we stand still until nobody raises another question? > It seems like ... Sentences that begin with those words can end in almost any way the author wishes, and in almost all cases we will have learned nothing.