I believe what GP is saying is that; 1. Having a child incurs a cost to employers. 2. Regardless of legality, a business will try to minimize this cost. 3. S

I believe what GP is saying is that; 1. Having a child incurs a cost to employers. 2. Regardless of legality, a business will try to minimize this cost. 3. Since it's illegal during an interview to even touch upon the subject of having kids and what a candidate's strategy may be to remain a productive employee while raising a child, employers may be even more discriminatory towards _everyone_ of a child-bearing age, in order to avoid discriminating against recent or soon-to-be parents. So, how can we alter the incentive structure for employers such that they're not tempted to discriminate. Should we shift the cost burden of child rearing to the govt? Or should we allow an employer to ask you about your plans for having children and how it will affect your employment