3 ms·
Are you going to say that to the founders of reddit & airbnb?
by zebnyc 8y ago
Are you going to say that to the founders of reddit & airbnb?
- paulie_a 8y agoI would absolutely say that to them. It's doubtful they actually committed a crime but it shows a lack of character and constituition to say the least and potentially fraud to their investors. Fake it until you make it makes you a scam artist, con man, flim flan man etc... People that embrace that philosophy are frauds and cheats that should not be trusted.
- meowface 8y agoSeeding a community where pseudo-anonymous users submit image/link content with images and links might be fraud by some semantic and technical definition (certainly not a legal one), but 1) it's pretty much necessary to get something like that off the ground, 2) no one is really being deceived or misled in a significant way. I'd say it's pretty harmless. My understanding is reddit did this at the very start of the site's existence and stopped pretty early. They probably would've died quickly if they didn't seed some content.
- asveikau 8y agoIf the way you are going to talk to someone depends on how successful you think they are, you may be doing it wrong.
- Fnoord 8y agoI do, and the "fake it until you make it" doesn't fly very well in Europe; its generally frowned upon. Which also explains why there isn't much of a "startup culture" in Europe.
- stealthmodeclan 8y agoWhich also explains why there isn't much of a "startup culture" in Europe. Europe doesn't reward winners. So Europeans move to the US for their startups. Do you know Europe is the largest buyer of the US securities? They surely feel compelled enough to benefit from the business scene in the US.
- detaro 8y agoWhat did airbnb fake? Reddit is an interesting case, but I'd say there's a categorical difference between faking that you are able to do something you can't (Theranos) and pre-filling a functioning site with content (I assume that's what you are referring to?). It's especially relevant if the difference actually matters for whom you are tricking: If the results had been accurate (which from what I understand they weren't) and absent any other specific claims of superiority Theranos end-users wouldn't care about what tech they use, but for investors relying on claims that they can do something others can't to establish their value it obviously does matter. Which in the case of reddit I guess makes the question: does it make a material difference for users if the site they enjoy is entirely fed by an organic community, or is the most important thing that the site is enjoyable regardless of origin? I guess you could argue that faking a community is also "faking that you are able to do something you can't".