5 ms·
Steve Jobs definitely wasn't engaged in criminal fraud, so the prosecutor will definitely be trying to demonstrate she wasn't "the next Steve Jobs". Given what
by hawkice 8y ago
Steve Jobs definitely wasn't engaged in criminal fraud, so the prosecutor will definitely be trying to demonstrate she wasn't "the next Steve Jobs". Given what we know we should hear that prosecutors' argument.
- jason_slack 8y agoWhy the down vote, she is referred to as the next Steve Jobs: https://mashable.com/2018/03/14/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-sec-fraud/ https://mashable.com/2018/03/14/elizabeth-holmes-theranos-se...
- hawkice 8y agoBecause being popular doesn't make you above the law. The comment is at best irrelevant, at worse morally noxious.
- jason_slack 8y agoBut I asked why is she considered that way. I’m not saying she is special but why do people say she is the next Jobs.
- gaius 8y agobut why do people say she is the next Jobs Because she put considerable effort into fostering that impression, even dressing like Jobs in the same trademark black turtleneck sweaters he always wore. All part of the con.