3 ms·
physorg has been a very popular site ever since 2004 and well respected for its compilation of scientific and technical papers. It's probably not malware - a mo
by drak0n1c 8y ago
physorg has been a very popular site ever since 2004 and well respected for its compilation of scientific and technical papers. It's probably not malware - a more reasonable and common explanation for bad CPU performance is that one of the web or ad frameworks they use is poorly made.
- GW150914 8y agoWell respected? It takes in science (sometimes) and futurist hype (mostly) and belches out something resembling pop science. There are quite a few decent sites that turn papers and headlines into brief articles, but Physorg is not one of them. They are to science what clickbait is to news.
- gmueckl 8y agoDo you have references to sites that are good in your opinion? I am looking for better ways to keep track of progress outside my area of expertise.
- GW150914 8y agoSorry for the late reply! https://www.sciencenews.org https://www.sciencenews.org http://www.sciencemag.org http://www.sciencemag.org https://www.nature.com https://www.nature.com https://www.eurekalert.org https://www.eurekalert.org https://physicsworld.com https://physicsworld.com
- pavel_lishin 8y agoCiting their use of ad frameworks isn't an argument against malware.