3 ms·
Was referring to the fact they're all languages which compile to native executables.
by Mikeb85 8y ago
Was referring to the fact they're all languages which compile to native executables.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- rlander 8y agoWell you’re either confused or being purposefully ingenuous. The original poster, samuell, said nothing about languages which compile to native executables, he said he’s looking for “languages with light-weight threads automatically mapped (multiplexed) to physical threads, like in Go”. Hence the suggestion of Erlang, which is valid. Further, making a generic statement that Erlang is “slow af” adds nothing to the discussion.