Yeah, that's a good point; I saw that later in another comment that illumination on the ground was almost nothing. I guess burning rocket fuel for electricity/

Yeah, that's a good point; I saw that later in another comment that illumination on the ground was almost nothing. I guess burning rocket fuel for electricity/heat is probably the most practical mitigation. I expect it would be tremendously inefficient, but better than freezing due to a once-a-decade dust storm. Lots of batteries or nuclear could also work if it's available.