UNHRC happens to be the one entity whose bad reputation is somewhat justified, although I guess the US President just made it his point that talking is always b

UNHRC happens to be the one entity whose bad reputation is somewhat justified, although I guess the US President just made it his point that talking is always better than not talking? There are other UN institutions far more useful, and also far more liable to be harmed by a US boycott. UNHCR would be first on that lis. They are currently caring for millions of refugees, helping both them as well as the western countries that would be overrun by asylum-seekers without these efforts. They do so on a shoestring budget (something like $2 per person/day).